FUNCTIONALISM IN EDUCATION
View the videos on Functionalism and also read your handout based on this theory. Answer the following questions below and respond to two of your colleagues' comments.
How do functional sociologists view the education system?
What support is there for functionalist views of education?
How do functional sociologists view the education system?
ReplyDeleteFunctional sociologists view the education system as one where society and institutions within society (education), are made up of interdependent parts all working together, each contributing some activity for the functioning of the society to maintain order and consensus among individuals in the group (Ballantine & Hammack, 2012, p. 11). The belief is that as systems encounter change and are forced to adapt to new situations; the system/society is not disrupted.
The evolution of functionalism as dictated by Émile Durkheim, a French sociologist, looked at education from a sociological standpoint where there was a direct relationship between society and institutions. The interest lies in how social order is maintained and how society can be stable. The functionalist perspective of education is one of interdependence where the state provides education for students who in turn pay taxes in order for the state to survive. Families are dependent on educational institutions so that their children could gain employment to raise their own families. In the process, students become law-abiding taxpaying citizens who in turn support the state. If all goes well, the parts of society produces order, stability, and new productivity. If it fails, the parts of society must then adapt to recapture a new order, stability, and productivity (Anderson & Taylor, 2009, para. 3).
Functional sociologists see the education system as one that encompasses socialization, skills provision and role allocation. Education helps support society by the socialisation of young people to values and as such categorizes people to the posts to which they are best suited according to their talents through the use of examinations and qualifications. Consequently, each person can succeed on the basis of ability. Schools operate according to meritocratic principles and status is achieved on the basis of merit (Louisecp1, 2012, para. 1).
The contemporary functional theory states that consensus and common bond unites groups working towards a goal. Shared values then, keeps society in balance. Nevertheless, contemporary functionalism does not embrace change and as such fails to deal with differences in beliefs, interests and values. There is the inability of analyzing teacher-student relationships. Finally, it assumes that change is slow and planned and does not affect the balance of the system when in reality, it does especially if the society is rapidly changing.
References
Anderson, M.L. & Taylor, H.F. (2009). Sociology: The Essentials, Belmont, CA: ThomsonWadsworth. Retrieved from http://sociology.about.com/od/Sociological- Theory/a/Functionalist-Theory.htm
Ballantine, J. H. & Hammack, F.M. (2012). The Sociology of Education, a Systematic Analysis. (7th ed.). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Louisecp1. (2012). Functionalism and Education. Retrieved from http://sociogeeks.moonfruit.com/#/blog/4558814158/Functionalism-and- Education/1238359
Dear Mr. Espat, I agree with all your saying except for, 'The belief is that as systems encounter change and are forced to adapt to new situations' . I believe you mean to say certain systems are forced to change as in Belize or Cuba for example. However, in other systems where functionalist and sociologist play a major role, change in systems help a system continually adapt to circumstances; change is generally viewed as a slow evolutionary process that does not disrupt the ongoing system (Ballantine & Hammack p. 11)
DeleteI agree with your views on the educational system being a back-bone to society. It is indeed a fact that the schools prepare students for the working environment in relation to the meritocratic principle. Parson views education as being part of a meritocracy, where everyone is given equal opportunity in regard to achievements/rewards that are based on effort ability, Para. 3. In contrast, to the functionalism, this can only be achieve if the educational system adapt the consensus perspective in allowing students to reach their full potential.
DeleteReference
Parson, T., Durkheim, E. (2014). History learning site. Functionalism. CO.UK. Retrieve from: http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/functionalism.htm
What support is there for functionalist views of education?
ReplyDeleteThe functionalist views of education have some support as the theory promotes a sense of belonging and being part of a community. High schools in Belize for example, compete via sports and as such, school teams have uniforms, sporting competitions and activities. These provide students with a sense of pride and team work and instil a culture of unity and identity.
The functionalist theory promotes the maintenance of social order where roles and rules are present in a society. Students learn that some people have more power than others; manners are important. They learn patterns of behaviour that will help them to survive in society when they leave school (Louisecp1, 2012, para. 5).
The functionalist theory promotes meritocracy where people become employed according to the abilities they possess. Such abilities are known as division of labour where people can be highly skilled or specialized. According to Émile Durkheim, a French sociologist, schools pass on societal values to students who will leave with the knowledge and skills to be productive citizens.
In the 1940s and 1950s, the functionalist perspective had support from American functionalists who looked at discovering the functions of human behaviour. Robert K. Merton, an American functionalist sociologist said humans had two functions: manifest and latent. People having the manifest function would attend a church and would worship as a community. Those who had a latent function would differentiate personal from institutional values.
In the United States, Talcott Parsons developed Émile Durkheim´s ideas and championed the functionalist view of education where schools pass on the norm and values of wider society and we learn the rules that apply outside the home (louisecp1, 2012, para. 7). In 1945, Davis and Moore, following Parsons and Durkheim´s logic, suggested that the educational system has inequalities and as such there is a functional explanation for such inequality. They challenged that every society has inequalities and must be for the good of society. This perspective justified the high pay and status of the wealthy people in society.
A final support of the functional perspective came in 1971 when Jonathan Turner suggested that the education system serves to allow people to ascend the ladder of opportunity through grammar schools and examination systems. He recognized that many individuals who aspire for success may not attain it. Schools then indirectly teach students who are less successful to accept their inability of obtaining highly paid jobs.
References
Louisecp1. (2012). Functionalism and Education. Retrieved from http://sociogeeks.moonfruit.com/#/blog/4558814158/Functionalism-and- Education/1238359
What support is there for functionalist view of education?
DeleteMr. Espat! This is just my take on the functionalist view of education. When I was viewing the video, I was impressed of the " Organic Analogy" of how functionalist view schools. It stated that society is like a body, if one organ fails the body dies. That concept is applicable to the education system. When I say "system" am relating to the whole that preceedes its parts. Family, Religion, Politics, Economics and Health Care are all apart of a support system. Gone are the days when education was only seen as the teacher responsibility. I always used the triangular approach to education which encompasses 1. Teacher, 2. Student and 3. Parents. Outside of that we need the community, Religion, Government and Health Care and of course the private sector should also nurish that process. Which brings me to my next point which Durkheim (1898) pointed out that "school is a vehicle for transmitting Norms and Values and keeping those values consenus. In conclusion, it is clear that Functionalists tend to paint a positive picture of the education system, suggesting that it is an institution which promotes social cohesion, social mobility and economic stability. Through its role as an agent of secondary socialisation, the introduction of the national curriculum and the design of the qualification system, functionalists argue that the education system contributes to the positive function of society and to the benefits of its students. However, critics, mainly from the Marxist perspective find that class inequality is perhaps one of the biggest factors that functionalism ignores. Although, it is often the case that governments do attempt to champion the education system as an institution of social mobility, with policy which aims to reflect and increase this. Furthermore, support for Functionalism also comes from the overwhelming statistics that countries with more graduates tend to have more highly advanced economies,- support the work of Davis and Moore.
http://markedbyteachers.com
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteSampson, I must say that I agree with you. Back in time education was everyone's priority, now it is no one's priority. When I say no one it is an exaggeration. Some parents are no longer showing interest in their child's education likewise the child him/herself. This is where sometimes we find that teachers also tend to lose focus on that specific child. I'm not saying all teachers but in reality some. Education was taught to be the key in success and according to Durheim(1989) he has shown us the real importance of education. Education is a small but crucial part of society which is needed in order for society to function.
DeleteToday education within the classrooms is becoming old-fashioned especially in an advanced technological world we live in today. Social media such as facebook, whats app, viber, heywire, youtube etc. are how children are learning. It is why most universities are trying to do online campuses. One can see us advancing into this online era for example by blogging as we all are. Using forums, emails, online group chats are other examples as well.
DeleteThrough technology one will be able to reach to the youths of today. Since we have not gotten to that state where we do classes online fully, technology will be used in a nonsensical way by the "haves" and "have nots".
It will take time for youths to clear their conscience to see the bigger and brighter picture to appreciate education, moreover appreciate their technology and use it effectively. Indeed, some children do not care because of their parents. However, there are outside factors that also contribute to how a child behaves and grows with moral values.
Functional Sociologist view the educational system as a preparatory or incubation period in which students are learned or taught values that would be valuable for them to successfully integrate into the society as adults (Ballantine & Hammack, 2012). The education system allows children to interact with each other and practically be able to mimic some roles required by society such as working with each other, and assuming different leadership roles. The interdependence with the society and the educational system helps institutions to provide a suitable curriculum that would prepare students to meet the demands of our society. This interdependence support sociologist views there is a direct correlation to the effectiveness of an institution and the productivity of our society.
ReplyDeleteOf course, the functionalist theory can only be effective if there is support from all other elements that makes up the society since change, from their view, is a slow process. Hence, any radical change will interrupt the natural flow causing other elements of the society to absorb any change in order for it to return to normalcy (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2014). Evidence of true social cohesion could be indicated by societies that experience very little social conflict. Basic needs and access to education are readily available, and the output from the educational system allows students to quickly meet the needs or replace those required within the workforce, notwithstanding the fact that such achievement is very difficult since we are not living in a perfect world.
Supporting evidences of the functionalist theory include those suggested by Talcott Pearson, that the family is the primary socialization agency where roles are inherited while the school takes over to provide equality regardless of the roles assigned or inherited at home. This allows schools to provide universalistic standards where a child is regarded for their personal achievement, such as education and specialization. Similarly, David Hargreaves supported the functionalist view that modern societies focus too much on the development of an individual than instilling values. Many are caught up in their individual achievement than looking at the holistic function of a society. Laws and Social Facts are placed to ensure social cohesion and reduce the chance of social conflict. This does not mean that an individual will lack freedom of choice, however the underling notion to teach students the roles and function of the society should be ever existent (University of Mumbai).
References
Ballantine, J. H., & Hammack, F. M. (2012). The Sociology of Education a Systematic Analysis. In Sociology of Education (7th ed., pp. 10 - 13). Pearson.
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. (2014). What is the functionalist perspective in sociology? Retrieved February 7, 2015, from CliffsNotes: http://www.cliffsnotes.com/cliffsnotes/sciences/what-is-the-functionalist-perspective-in-sociology
University of Mumbai. (n.d.). Education Role of Education Functionalist and Critical Perspective. Retrieved February 8, 2015, from Study Material: http://www.mu.ac.in/myweb_test/SYBA%20Study%20Material/Soc-III%20marathi.pdf
Partick views and answers to both question were clear and very explanatory you made me understand a little more about the reading and what i missed
DeleteDear Mr. Flowers,
DeleteI concur that educational institutions do play an integral role in preparing our students into society. Your tenet that “the functionalist theory can only be effective if there is support from all other elements that make up the society since change, from their view, is a slow process” surely struck me. It was thought provoking as it made me question what happens when all the other elements that make up the society seem to be failing in unison. For example, if some educational institutions in Belize fail in the provision of adequate labs, sufficient supplementary materials via hand-outs, proper classroom ambience, and excellent management, how would such slow change on the failures impact students who would otherwise be sitting CXC exams in the short term? It seems that the slow process of change would indeed affect our students as they integrate into the society. They would have been unprepared as the tenet, “If you fail to plan, plan to fail” advocates.
In addition, suppose other elements like the family unit are dysfunctional in that students fail to have a dad or mom and may be living with other relatives. And suppose in Belize, there are other factors such as a lack of entertainment for teenagers. There are just restaurants, discos/clubs and movie theatres that have adult content which might not be conducive for students. In a sense then, there may be a collective failure by interdependent elements as change would be a slow process. The adage, “While the grass grows, the horse is dying” is highly pertinent. Within the functionalist view, slow change, especially if pervasive within all elements, would result in a society that is not fully functional.
The functionalist view has me reflecting on the status quo in Belize. Can we conclude that our societal ills be a direct result of such interdependent elements failing to adapt to rapid change? When partisan politics highlights corruption and excessive financial spending, when the education minister says teachers are not professionally trained, when our very police officers get arrested, when people fail to partake in services at their respective churches, and when human life is insignificant for a few criminals, it begs the question if we indeed have failing interdependent elements in Belize. It suggests that the rapidly changing technological and societal changes cannot be absorbed by these elements and as such, seems to have our society failing to perform normally. True social cohesion is highly indicative of a society that experiences very little conflict. In the Belizean context, our societal ills, in my opinion, tend to stem from the inability of the interdependent elements to deal with the ever-rapid and ever-changing trends of our Belizean society. Thus, I posit that our knowledge and understanding of the functionalist theory affords us the opportunity to highlight the effects/consequences of change in our society.
How do functional sociologists view the education system?
ReplyDelete• Emile Durkheim; the father of the functionalist theory, once state that, it is the balance that between institutions and the social facts. With the two entities mentioned, the theorist, states that they both complement each other, hence there were some balance that was developed to build an individual holistically. In accordance with the video, it is said that one is born into society, and is a part of society; entities are used to make up a cell. Each within the organism is dependent on one another in order for the society to function the way it should. The video out rightly demonstrated that the purpose of institutions is used to help society to live in order and govern the way we live and furthermore is used to educate the people that it is a part of.
• The role of the education system within the society; is to do three main things. Those roles are to socialize, skill building and allow them to find their place in society. A society, has many different individuals varying from different sex and creed and in order for them to function properly, the institution such as the school is placed to build the values. In building socialization; a person learns how to deal with person of a society, whether they agree with the order of the day, see the same views as ethically, come from the same cultural background, or even as religious belief. Through socialization they can be better individuals and by extension, build their skills. Through education, one knows how to build their skills, whether through dance, music, drama, or any other skills that was given to them by God.
• Lastly, it helps one to find his/her place within society. Through the education system one can rebuild society and shape it when they find their place within the society. Through society careers and jobs are developed as well as avenues for individuals to see how they can build it up that same society.
What support is there for functionalist views of education?
• Being recognized as a catalyst for change, education is in place to help one to move from one level of society to another by developing and managing how one function within the society. Society according to video number two, tell us that society is like a body, if a part of the body fails to function, then the body dies. According to the literature provided, functional theory today, tell us that schools are one part of the interdependent system in which each society; whether be family, religion, health, education and politics makes up the society.
• The school is there to provide or bring the gap through teaching and instilling norms and values such as manners and rules and that governs that land. One proof, however; coming from Jonathan Turner, imply that through school, one climbs the ladder of success, and even if one don’t meet the goal, set at the time through school, they it helps one to better themselves and try and aim for a better self in society and jobs.
• Other proofs from the functional perspective on education is how through the educational system, Durkheim feels that with a functioning society promoting norms and values that will build up the society then it is safe to say that functionalist views of education stands. Through the educational system the three major facts such as socialization, building skills and finding a place in society also stand out. If one can acquire the three important points, then becoming a functioning individual would be a matter of practice.
In reference to your points, I find myself agreeing with you deeply for the mere fact that our environment influences our school system and vice versa. To really understand the functionalism in education, it is said that we must first understand the micro-level aspects of the educational system (The Answers to the Future Lie in our Past by Martin S Pribble ). Go back to the past where the problem first started, which is in the feminism perspective. Feminism shines light on social classes, inequalities, gender roles and so on. Therefore, if we apply the feminist theories to the classroom to how students are treated differently and integrate it to the functionalism approach then and only then we can understand the educational system that exists today.
DeleteI agree with your view when you expressed the function of the school. The school system allows students to develop interpersonal skills that would help them to merge seamlessly in the society. Besides instilling good morals, it also prepares us to be ready for the working force as you rightly noted. Many don’t realize that if the school system fails to provide an environment that is conducive to learning, not only has the system failed in itself but all other parts and such problems will be transferred to other parts of the society since the children we are preparing today will be the workforce for tomorrow.
DeleteHow do functional sociologist view the education system?
ReplyDeleteAccording to Emile Durkheim a professor he was the first person to to recommend that a sociologist approach be used in the study of education. His ideas were very great on the education system as he work with educating and lecturing. He was a man who put his all into the education system as he was holistically apart of it and placed his views and concerns where ever they were needed. He goes on to say that the importance of education in creating moral values as the foundation of society. The way that he also view this system goes on to say that education and society ties into each other and in other words they reflect each other so they cannot be separated. Sociologist believes that students should be prepared to face the world with values that are thought and instilled in the institution that they attend to improve the system of education. Sociologist are very interested in education and they have many interest in studying it.
What support is there for functional views of education?
As we should all take note of the fact that every person's learning start from one's home. It should be noted that learning can only take us so far and likewise when we venture into our classrooms, if a lecturer's only methodd of teaching was from solely based on academical achievements where would we learn to function in society, How would we be thought morals and more so the know how to survive and prosper in a diverse community such as Belize. For example which is comprised of many different cultures and races and persons with different thoughts and beliefs. This is where the social teachings in education plays a key role. Besides teaching formal knowledge such as reading, writing, and arithmetic, a sociological stand point incorporates teachings of morals, ethics, and values. Such combined teachings will prepare young people to head out into society not only academically equiped but sociable as well. In many cases knowing how to get around in society can take you to places where 'book smarts' alone won't. The world is a very interactive place and knowing how to socialize is a great asset a person has to get around in the world more easily.
Dear Ms. Westby,
DeleteIn reading your response, I was intrigued by your comment that Durkheim´s perspective was one based on a society built on moral values and high moral rectitude. As an educator for the past twenty plus years, I have seen the deteriorating values in our children. In the past, when teachers stepped into a classroom, there was respect for such an individual. Today, it is absent. In the past, students supported each other; today, they are highly competitive and selfish. In the past, when students had integrity and strong character, today, we find it is highly lacking.
It is imperative then that we analyse and ascertain where the breakdown in the value system of our youth lies. If within the functionalist theory all elements are interdependent, then elements within our society are failing. Talcott Pearson championed that the family is the primary social unit where roles are inherited and learned. It suggests then that our lack of moral rectitude stems from a lack of a strong family unit.
Pervasive in our society is the disrespect for women who from time to time are seen in news casts as abused, raped, divorced and left to sustain a child with BZ $50 weekly when seeking assistance from the family court. Present in our society is a total disrespect and disregard for God. Spirituality is non-existent in some of our students. If, according to Pearson, the family unit is where roles are inherited, it begs to question if our families are failing in the provision of positive roles for our students to emulate. Pervasive in our society is the large number of males who do not make it to the tertiary level. Our males fail to partake in the economic sector &/or the gross national product of our country. Mediocrity and a lack of ambition seem to be the status quo for some of our students. Perhaps I could list unending negative value systems rampant in our society. The question is how we, as educators, can become active participants in solving the problems rather than partaking in them.
You stated, Ms. Westby that “every person´s learning starts from one´s home.” Your response has surely sparked curiosity in me that the fundamental problem in Belize´s societal problems directly stems from the breakdown of the family unit. Too often we see attempts being made to facilitate economic aid to students and the provision of feeding programs as band aid solutions. I posit that perhaps we need to teach our young men to be responsible in our educational institutions so that the sanctity of the sacrament of marriage could be upheld where young men become responsible for their families rather than abandoning them. Perhaps we as a nation are failing in the educational element of the functionalist theory where educational institutions may not be instilling the necessary values that eventually will be pre-requisites for successful families/homes. Or perhaps it could be the family unit failing in the provision of values to the children. Thus, it is imperative that we educators become actively involved in searching for that necessary change that will spark social cohesion rather than social conflict. The former fosters a strong society with high moral rectitude; the latter only seeks to destroy it.
https://www.google.com.bz/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&ei=5TzYVJbyJdPIsAS7poHIDg&url=http://www.mu.ac.in/myweb_test/SYBA%2520Study%2520Material/Soc-III%2520marathi.pdf&ved=0CDUQFjAH&usg=AFQjCNHZPaZYMfUXX77cR1jVJzHyXhYBcw&sig2=ETdsPF6cbs1RxjFIBrRfDw
ReplyDelete1. How do functionalism sociologists view the education system?
ReplyDeleteSociologists used the analysis of the “human body” in regards to the education system where each sub-group work hand in hand in contributing for the survival of society. Ex. Stability, displaying law and order to the educational system intact giving room to instill moral values into the students. Moreover, it seeks to bring about change within the classroom in finding the common good. Sociologists then create a new vision to education in striving for adaptation in moving one from hopeless to optimistic in a socializing environment. Just image possibilities of an educational system that support equality and justice for all, this new approach will unlock unknown potential within the students.
2. What support is there for functionalist view of education?
The functionalist view is that there is a consensus perspective achieving the common good within the classroom where each student will reach their full potential through socialization. So then, education is a secondary agent of socialization-bridge between family and society. Parsons, history learning site 2014, believes that education instill values of competition, equality, and individualism, Para. 3. Durkheim, founder of the functionalist theory, focuses on the ways that universal education serves the needs of society. He sees education in its manifest role: conveying basic knowledge and skills to the next generation. The goal is to bring people together from different diverse background- building on core values and social control. An Ex. Japanese student, Houghton 2014, is a culture that values community in place of individuality in them learning to bring honor to the group rather than to themselves, Para. 3. In contrast to Houghton 2014, it is seen that parents who reject this function of education often choose to home-school their children or place them in private schools that support their values, Para. 8.
Reference
Parson, T., Durkheim, E. (2014). History learning site. Functionalism. CO.UK. Retrieve from: http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/functionalism.htm
I do like the idea of a school system where justice and equality is the order of the day. With this in mind, all students will be able to showcase their special talents and skills and get the opportunity to excel academically and socially.
DeleteI do like the idea and point Christina is making, and i Do have to agree with Mason, if your attending a school, where you as a student can feel a sense of safety in the respect to justice and equality, your performance will be at its highest. I feel that if the educational system will be a success :)
DeleteThe functionalists have identified education as a crucial part of the socialisation process as it transmits and re-inforces society’s norms and values, prepares children for adult roles and selects young people in terms of their abilities for crucial roles. However, their views have been criticised for various reasons mainly for being to optimistic in how the educational system operates. The functionalist perspective attempts to explain social institutions as collective means to meet individual and social needs. It is sometimes called structural-functionalism because it often focuses on the ways social structures meet social needs.
ReplyDeleteFunctionalism draws its inspiration from the ideas of Emile Durkheim. Durkheim was concerned with the question of how societies maintain internal stability and survive over time. He sought to explain social stability through the concept of solidarity, and differentiated between the mechanical solidarity of primitive societies and the organic solidarity of complex modern societies. The functionalist perspective continues to try and explain how societies maintained the stability and internal cohesion necessary to ensure their continued existence over time. In the functionalist perspective, societies are thought to function like organisms, with various social institutions working together like organs to maintain and reproduce them. The various parts of society are assumed to work together naturally and automatically to maintain overall social equilibrium. Because social institutions are functionally integrated to form a stable system, a change in one institution will precipitate a change in other institutions. Dysfunctional institutions, which do not contribute to the overall maintenance of a society, will cease to exist. The parts all depend on each other. For example, the government, or state, provides education for the children of the family, which in turn pays taxes on which the state depends to keep itself running. The family is dependent upon the school to help children grow up to have good jobs so that they can raise and support their own families. In the process, the children become law-abiding, taxpaying citizens, who in turn support the state. If all goes well, the parts of society produce order, stability, and productivity. If all does not go well, the parts of society then must adapt to recapture a new order, stability, and productivity.
Hydeia, you clearly stated that the functionalist views have been criticised for many reasons mainly for being too optimistic in how the educational system operates. One of the major strong points of the functionalist system is that it places a great emphasis on the importance of socialization within schools and that it points to links between social institutions in the society. However great disadvantages are seen through this system; while we are concentrating in the socialization aspect we fail to realize that people do not share the same norms and values and this system strongly ignores social inequalities such as racism, sexism and social class which play a significant role in the functioning of socialization within schools. In a nutshell to conclude we can say that it justifies inequality.
DeleteMiss Golanche, I love the idea reiterated that if parts of an evolving society will help in its evolution or wont positively assist that it should be severed! No one component is more important than the other and its because of this that when one of its components is not helpful, they must cease to exist. Makes me wonder what institution in our Belizean society today must cease to exist for us to regain 'stability!' Lastly, families, the heads at least, need to realize that family rearing is extremely important in that education starts at home and is a process that is continued throughout one's lifetime.
DeleteHow do functional sociologists view the education system?
ReplyDeleteFunctional sociologists view the education system as one where by they have a consensus. (Ballantine & Hammack, 2012, p. 11) The link between the society and the institutions are visible. Each of them contributes by being active in the society. They try to examine the society and maintain if for the common good of all. A functionalist tries to enforce emphasis on the aspects that are positive for the schools such as socialization, skill building and a place in the society. Education is the institution within the society that helps maintain the society by socializing young people into values of their achievement, the competitions, equality and the opportunities that they face in life. Education and teaching is the main focus. Education will help people to earn the most appropriate jobs, better their talents and past examinations and get qualified to better their place in society. In this case their provisional skills will be of much importance. Education will teach the skills for the economy; a good example of that would be IT (computer skills), literacy for the specific occupations that they will venture in.
In according to the videos the two parts make it equal. There is the institution and the societal fact that enables the balance. The society is like a cell that has different parts within it. And the social facts such as the laws, rules, and other things that helps to govern the society. Those social facts will help the individual govern how that person lives and they basically learn that through education. Society is like the body. If one organ fails the body dies, so it prevalent that they work together.
Thus, some may refrain from contemporary functionalism because it does not allow the change that we need in the society. It may not aid in the difference beliefs that we experienced, the values and interests that we may have; simply because it may be different for all involved and change may not be a fast pace. The major sociologist perspective on education leads to functional, conflict, and symbolic interactions that may lead to other changes as well. Finally, any change on society reflects a change in education as well.
What support is there for functionalist views of education?
ReplyDeleteThere is support for the functionalist views of education. Education is a secondary agent of socialization – bridging the gap between the different societal make up. The functionalist views of education have some support as the theory promotes a sense of belonging and being part of a community. For example where by the schools is one part of an interdependent system which contributes to the society. These consensuses and the common bond that they form will help the members of society, and what they taught be reinforced in schools. Then through the institution for example the educational system will allow one to socialize. They will then learn to build skills that will enable them to build, help and change the society.
Therefore through socialization your innate skills will then be able to benefit society. For example: they are individuals who would consider themselves to be anti-social, but they are still a small group of people that they would socialize with. It is effective that the sociological approach is used in education. Hence the reason why Durkheim’s sociological approach was his unique contribution. They will then learn through major works such as: The field of sociology of education that was published in collections titled Moral Education (1961), The Evolution of Educational Thought (1977) and the Education and Sociology (1956). Thus, according to Louisecp1, 2012, it is true that they will learn patterns that will help them to survive in the society when they leave school.
Nicholett I completely agree with your blog but I would like to add that through their point of view a society is seen as a complex system whose parts must work together in order to have stability. Durkheim views education as an entity creating social solidarity and that through Education shared beliefs and values are transmitted. Schools themselves are a society since students cooperate, interact and follow rules which they are being thought knowledge and skills. He also stated that we need schools to help us to feel part of society. We learn social rules and social roles in school. So it is a functionalist strong belief that the reason why schools are important is because it sorts out people according to their skills and abilities for the most appropriate jobs.
DeleteI agree with what you said. In order for a school to function properly you must get the community involve. We just can't only look at them for financial support when we need them. I agree with Durkheim views that education is a social solidarity, where students interact and share their ideas with each other.
DeleteI agree with you miss Wright also Durhkiem said that every structure has a function that meets the needs of society.and for the school to function the community is needed.
DeleteI agree with you miss Wright also Durhkiem said that every structure has a function that meets the needs of society.and for the school to function the community is needed.
DeleteHow do functional sociologists view the education system?
ReplyDeleteFunctionalism is a view of sociology that suggests that the role of a sociologist is to look at the workings of society, in a scientific manner, in order to discover how it works. A functionalist’s perspective on education is to have a consensus perspective: examine society in terms of how it is maintained for the common good. A functionalist will put an emphasis on positive aspects of schools such as socialization: the learning of skills and attitudes in school. Functional sociologists then claim that the education system is a meritocracy and that the education system exists to allow the most talented students through to fill the most important jobs in society.
What support is there for functionalist views of education?
According to Durkheim, the final function of education is to sort people out to do the correct work for their ability (meritocracy). In modern societies, we have division of labor. Nobody has all of the skills that are needed to survive in our complex world. Durkheim said that schools pass on the general values of society to students and also provide the skills that they will need to work together and produce goods. People must specialize in the kind of work that they do; we have plumbers, careers, check-out operators and doctors. Society could not survive if we did not have people to do different work. People sit examinations, they are sorted out and then encouraged to take up jobs that is suited to what they are able to do. The most able will study the subjects that will encourage their thinking skills, and the low ability children are taught what they need for life.
Dear Sherice,
DeleteI believe that we may not have all the skills but there is at least one that we are good at and once we have found what our purpose as humans are we can focus on working and becoming the best we can at it. Meritocracy is exactly that taking what we are good at and making it better. we may not all be book smart but based on what you said it is important to acknowledge that without the skills of the plumber and mechanics and other hands on job the society would not function.
Totally agree with what you are saying Janine. We may not have all the skills needed to survive hence the reason we need to find our inner strengths and work on that particular strength. Durkheim also said it, we are all unique and we need each other to survive. Society is a whole that is made up of many inter-dependent parts needed to survive or flourish. We are individuals, therefore we are a part of society and like society we all need each other or other components in order to survive.
DeleteI agree with what you said. We have a special skill that we enjoy doing more than others. Some times it takes a while for us to focus and decide what we want to do. As you stated, what ever type of job or service you are providing to your community, Society needs you in order to function.
DeleteHow do functional sociologists view the education system?
ReplyDeleteAccording to Ballantine & Hammack (2012), the education system is a segment of the society’s system which comprises of family, education, religion, politics & economics, health care (p. 11). All these segments are codependent and working together results in a completely functioning society and social consistency. Therefore, functional sociologists such as Emile Durkheim are capable of making a direct relationship between society and its educational institutions. Emile Durkheim wrote,
Education is the influence exercised by adult generations on those that are not
yet ready for social life. Its object is to arouse and develop in a child a certain
number of physical, intellectual and moral states which are demanded of him by
both the political society as a whole and the special milieu for which he is
specifically destined (as cited in 1956, p.28).
Therefore, sociologists believed education is essential in creating moral values as the foundation of society in order to prepare young adults for social life (Ballantine & Hammack, 2012, p. 11). Moreover, the educational system cannot be separated from society for they reflect each other (Ballantine & Hammock, 2012, p. 12).
References:
Ballantine, J. H., & Hammack, F. M. (2012). The Sociology of Education a
Systematic Analysis. In Sociology of Education (7th ed., pp. 10 - 13). Pearson.
Functionalism and Education. (2014). Retrieved from
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/functionalsim_education.html
What support is there for functionalist views of education?
According to Ballantine and Hammock, the name sociology of education was introduced in the late 1920s by Robert Angell (1928)(p.10). Angell viewed educational institutions as sources for scientific data. However, the main function of an educational system is teaching a proper way of life to maintain a proper society as according to Talcott Parsons (1937) (p.13). Schools train children to develop morals and become an effective in socializing with others in society appropriately. If students achieve proper social values and knowledge of their environment, societies are capable of functioning in a productive and efficient way without collapse as in today’s society. Functionalist Robert Dreeben (1968) studied the schools as a social organization (pg 13, para. 2). Other functionalist such as James Coleman et al (1982) studied the background of students and their achievements. Functionalists Blau and Duncan studied the role of students within schools. Students were placed or allocated based on merit or even their status within society (1967) (p. 13, para. 2). Functionalist Davis and Moore also studied role allocation. In educational institutions, students who were bright and gifted were granted important roles in society. Davis and Moore believe that education sifts and sorts according to ability. On the other hand, the Marxist view on educational achievement is greatly influenced by social class background (Functionalism and Education, para. 4). Therefore, the supports for functionalist views are in plain sight. Functionalists are interested in education which is the bridge between all the parts of the social system.
References same as above
Dear Clarissa,
DeleteI most certainly agree with you, in order for society to function to its maximum potential it is necessary for all components to work together. You also mention that education is the influence exercised by adult generation on those that are not yet ready for social life, hence why teacher and parents and other factors give education much importance for they know that without education the impact that a child can have on society can be devastating, much as if they are well prepared it can have a great impact on society as well as on themselves.
Hi Mr. Patrick,
ReplyDeleteI support the fact that through the educational system the students will learn and develop these values. I like the terminology that you used “preparatory and incubation period”. I could attest to that because I successfully integrated into to the society as an adult and tried to make something of myself. The education system did allow me to excel simply because I had that drive and vast amount of motivation that took me there. As a student I was able to mimic the roles of my teachers and my peers around me. I was a visual learner and practiced what I was being shown in my surrounding. A lady by the name of Mrs. Geraldine Smith was my role model and I awarded her for the leadership roles that she portrayed. To some extent that is the true meaning why I became a teacher and also at the primary level as well. I do agree that the curriculum lend a helping hand that will groom that (child) individual to be a productive citizen, once it’s been taught the right way. The curriculum is like a stepping stone that is link at all levels.
Hence the reason why the functionalist theory can only be effective if there is support from all the other entities. “Change” in their eyes is a slow process and I have to concur that it is. Change will not come over night but over time. “Evidence of true social cohesion could be indicated by societies that experience very little social conflict.” Yet in that case those societies who experience very little conflict might not agree that it is social cohesion, but the norm for them.
Hey Sir Michael,
ReplyDeleteLinking back the videos will give the reader a better insight of what your understanding was. The society is like a cell that is one of the fundamental structural units of which all living tissue is composed of; the educational system could be compared to that. Hence the role of the education system with in the society is to: socialize, build your skills and find your place in society. The three main things may work through a process that will allow the individual to see the link among all three domains. Individuals in the society will tend to socialize and through that they can build their skills and put into use what they have learnt from their peers. I agree that through socialization they can become better individuals in their society and build their skills to help them be productive citizens.
Society is like a body, the organs in the body work together. That’s the reason why the educational team would prefer to observe group or peer activities during a lesson. Some of us don’t like change but it will come overtime. The individual will be learning from their peers in their surroundings that will be their classroom setting or their environment. We have to agree that some people may need that motivation or drive to help them succeed. Individuals who aspire for success my not attain it because of various reasons. School are then in place to indirectly teach students who will less fortunate to accept their inability of obtaining highly pain jobs. We have to understand that some may climb the ladder of success but not all of us my attain it.
How do functional sociologists view the education system?
ReplyDeleteAccording to Functionalists, education has three roles - socialization, skills provision and role allocation. They view the educational system as being necessary for the survival of society. It is the part which completes the whole. These parts: health, education, religion, etc., work together to promote stability within the society. Individuals from diverse backgrounds enter the educational system where their values and beliefs are shared among cultures. These individuals then receive the necessary training and education to prepare for their role in society. It is through education the right individuals are sorted and selected for the right jobs.
The functionalist perspective originated from the famous sociologist Emile Durkheim who sees the main functions of education is to bind members of society together to create social unity and solidarity. Education offers a way to pass on skills, knowledge and culture to individuals to become productive citizens. As stated by Durkheim, educational systems reflect underlying changes in society because the systems are a construct built by society, which naturally seeks to reproduce its collectively held values, beliefs, norms and conditions through its institutions.
What support is there for functionalist views of education?
The consensus perspective is for the common good- social order. Upon entering the classroom, each individual brings along their values, beliefs and culture whereby education continues to instill these values and prepare them for a smooth transitioning into society. Parson views education as being part of a meritocracy whereby individuals are given equal opportunities and that their rewards and achievements are based on ability and efforts. His views are supported by Duncan and Blau who believe that a modern economy depends for its prosperity on using human capital – its workers and skills. Therefore the educated works, pay taxes and helps with the building up of society. Davis and Moore examined role placement. They believe that education selects talented individuals and allocates them to the most important roles in society. Doing this encourages competition and motives others to take a challenge, strive for higher education and get the training needed. The more educated and skilled the majority of society is, the better it gets. We can observe what’s happening in our society today and tell the effects of institutions working together and vice versa. In a way I think our own observations can support the functionalist views of education.
Sam, C. (2008, December 20). What is the point of education? A functionalist perspective. Retrieved February 10, 2015, from http://sociologytwynham.com/8/12/20/what-is-the-point-of-education/
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. (2014). What is the functionalist perspective in sociology? Retrieved February 10, 2015, from CliffsNotes: http://www.cliffsnotes.com/cliffsnotes/sciences/what-is-the-functionalist-perspective-in-sociology
How do Functional Sociologists view the Educational System?
ReplyDeleteMs. Nicholett! I agree fully with most of what you said. But I would like to stress on the part you mentioned that " Education will teach the skills for the economy." Over the years the term "SKILL" have been taken for granted to mean only hands-on or technical vocational skills. Remember that functionalists see the school as vital part of society. That part is where norms and values are instill in our children. Therefore, you can have someone that is very skilled in their specific field or one that can produce qualifications. But if that person doesn't have the Life Skills as defined by UNICEF as " a behavior change or behavior development approach designed to address a balance of the areas: Knowledge, attitude and skills".Futhermore, with those skills it will enable a person to cope with stresses and challenges of daily life, especially skilss in communication and literacy, decision-making, occupational requirements, problem-solving, time management and planning. These skills my colleague will prepare a person for the "world of work". They will have proper time management skills to reach work on time and prioritize, Make sound decision regarding personal issues. I also too agree with the Skill Provision that yes education teaches you skilss needed for your role in society. It gave a perfect example of Math & English and others such as Photography, Dance, Music ect. But if we are thinking in terms of the developing an individual in a holistic approach then we need character education as well.
References:
Http://sociology.about.com
http://www.unodc.org/pdf/youthnet/tools-message_escap_mod%2007.pdf
How do functional sociologists view the education system?
ReplyDeleteThe functionalist theory basically outlines that all stakeholders in the environment inclusive of family, education, religion, politics, economics and health care play an integral role in order for society to function properly. In other words the educational system cannot be separated from society. Durkheim contributed that education plays an active role in order for change to take place. Furthermore Talcott Parsons views schools as the institution where appropriate behaviors are learned. However some of the problems of the functionalist theory are firstly, it fails to acknowledge individuality. Secondly, it provides difficulty in analyzing classroom interactions. In conclusion, the functional theory tries to explain how education contributes to maintaining order in society.
What support is there for functionalist view of education?
Durkheim spoke about the need for different parts of society in relation to education, discipline in the schools, and the role of schools in preparing students for society. This is true in that the entire environment plays a role in developing the child as a whole for interaction in the world. At home students are taught respect and how to behave properly. The church teaches moral and ethics. The media also provides insight into what is happening in the world. Furthermore, the internet allows students to have information at their fingertips. Therefore, all this clearly shows that all these different segments in society provide support for the functionalist view of education, whereby all components in society helps in educating the student.
Reference:
Ballantine, J. & Hammack, F. M. (2011). The sociology of education. New York, NY: Pearson.
In response to the first question, i have to agree with the point taken. In actuality and truth, it has always said without education and the education system where the institution is in place, we can all agree that without education, there wouldn't be any other industry, business entities or career. Education is like a bus which carries the other careers and put them to fruition.
Delete
ReplyDeleteHow do functional sociologists view the educational system?
Functionalism is viewed as a system of thinking. The Functionalist Theory focuses on ways that universal education serves the needs of society. (Theories of Education).
Functionalists see change in systems as helping the system adapt to new changes. Education helps maintain society by socializing young people into values of achievement, competition and equality of opportunity.
Emile Durkheim, well-known sociologists, views education as an entity creating social solidarity. Education transmits culture, shared beliefs and values. (Education and Sociology). Functionalist also sees education as a vital part of society system. Society is made up of many parts that are dependent on each other. Such parts are: Family, religion, economics, health care and of course, education.
Theories of Education.(n.d)Cliff Notes. Retrieved from: http://www.cliffsnotes.com/sciences/sociology/education/theories-of-education
Education and Sociology. (n.d).Retrieved from:
www.historylearningsite.co.uk.sociology
What support is there for functionalist view of education?
According to the video, (Functionalist View of the Role of Education) functionalists split education into 3 main parts. Such parts are: Socialization- at this stage, the educational system (schools) reinforces and teaches individuals the norms and values of life. It also helps them to be themselves and contribute some of who they are to others. They encourage individuals to share their values, beliefs and even culture. At this stage each individual is unique. Different schools will have career day or cultural day. This is where individuals belonging to different cultures will get the opportunity to educate others about their cultural practices and beliefs. At the same time they are also learning about other cultures. This helps to promote cultural acceptance. The Second stage is: Skills provision- individuals are not only interacting with each other, they are also learning some basic skills that is needed to take them through life. Example: Math, Reading, Science and History. Last stage is Role Allocation- this stage is very crucial because at stage individuals are being prepared to take on their roles in society. This stage helps individuals to prepare for that specific role in the future. Example: An individual will attend the University of Belize and enter the Nursing Field to further his/her education because that individual’s interest is to become a figure in the Nursing field. All three roles/ stages are still taking place at the schools in our country so this is one way to prove that the functionalist, Emile Durheim (1898) views of education still exists. Other functionalists that supported Durkheim are: Parsons (1956), Young (1961) and Davis & Moore (1945).
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteHow do functionalist sociologists view the educational system?
ReplyDeleteThe functionalist theory is often commonly referred to as structural-functionalism, consensus, or equilibrium. As the latter names suggests, this theory is focused on viewing the society or in this case, the education system as an important part of a complex system, where each member must contribute to ensure that the system works as it should.
Education can be viewed as a social institution. According to functionalism, there are many key players within the education system. These include health, education, politics and economics. Functionalist sociologists argue that these key players are interdependent and rely on the success of each other to ensure that the system operates as it should. Analogy can be drawn using a bicycle. A bicycle is made from many different parts such as the seats, wheels and chain. Some of these parts can be used by itself, however, the bicycle will not work if one or more of the parts are missing.
There are several sociologists who contributed to and have supported functionalism and education. Emile Durkheim was one of the first who used the functional approach to education. He focused on the relationship between society and societal institutions and their social cohesion. Furthermore, he purported that education creates social supports social solidarity by transmitting culture and shared values and customs.
Another sociologist who contributed to functionalism in education is Parson. He discussed education in terms of meritocracy. Meritocracy denotes that all persons be given an equal opportunity.
Lastly, Davis and Moore contributed to functionalism in terms of role allocation. Davis and Moore explained that education allows roles to be allocated to individuals based on intellectual talents.
References
Functionalism and Education. Retrieved from: http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/functionalsim_education.htm
What is the functionalist perspective in sociology? Retrieved from http://www.cliffsnotes.com/cliffsnotes/sciences/what-is-the-functionalist-perspective-in-sociology
How do functional sociologists view the education system?
ReplyDeleteFunctionalism looks at how society and education are interdependent in order to maintain order and consensus within groups. This in turn promotes the stability of society. Durkheim believed that there was a need for different institutions in relation to education, in order to fulfill the different needs of children in an effort to prepare them to be functional members of society. Although Durkheim’s theory was true then and still is today, we need to look at the fact that society is changing. Attitudes and behaviors have changed. Therefore, new and different approaches are required to equip children with the essential skills they need to become functional members of this present society.
Reference:
Ballantine, J. & Hammack, F. M. (2011). The sociology of education. New York, NY: Pearson.
What support is there for functionalist views of education?
Functionalists view education as a means to an end. A tool used to move ahead in society to attain status and prosperity. They look at education as a necessary resource utilized to prepare children for different roles in society. Teachers mold children to become better citizens, by means of teaching children values, morals, and skills. Ashley Crossman believes that the government provides education to children; in return the parents pay taxes which help the economy grow. The family depends on schools to help children grow and become functional members of society. This allows them the capacity to get a good job and be able to have a better life. However, if one part of the education system is not working the way it should, the entire chain of order within society is affected. This results in the deterioration of all the other parts of society causing social problems.
On the other hand, Parson looked at education as a meritocracy. He believed education to be more of a competition, equality and individual based mechanism. He believed that children could achieve desired dreams through hard work and dedication. Parson together with Duncan and Blau believed that modern economies depend on their human capital to achieve prosperity. These economies use humans to their maximum potential capacity, through effective allocation, placing them in the best jobs and roles possible within society.
Reference:
Crossman, A. Functionalist theory. Retrieved from
http://sociology.about.com/od/Sociological-Theory/a/Functionalist-Theory.htm
Bryant, L. Functionalism & education. Retrieved from
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/functionalsim_education.htm
Dear Janine
DeleteI do agree that the approach we take to educate our students in this present time has to be different from the past. Teachers and educators have to divert from that traditional manner of teaching and employ a more progressive approach. Therefore to add further to your post, I think that students need to be more exposed to more real life scenarios that will prepare them for real life experiences.
Hi Janine, I agree with that approach. 'Chalk and talk' won't do. Teachers need to be more resourceful in identifying different approaches to use when educating. This generation is totally different. You have to execute with methods that will keep them engage through out. The use of technology, hands on activity and as Mason Wade said real life scenarios will making learning more interesting for them.
DeleteI agree with you mason an not only the way we educate or students are different now but also the way we have to talk to them. I could only imagine our students performance if our teachers were still traditional. I prefer the traditional way still. Moreover, I do agree that they need to be more exposed and they are not. They forget morals and values life and that is why the traditional was always right.
DeleteHow do functional sociologists view the education system?
ReplyDeleteThe quote by Talcott Parsons “The school system is a microcosm of the adult occupational world, and experience in it is a main field of operation of the second stage mechanisms of socialization, the specification of role-orientation“ encircles the ideology of functional sociologist view educational systems. Besides believing that the educational system of any society is very dependent on other organizations, the functional sociologist also agree that norms and morals thought at this level in any individuals life adds to that person’s psycho-social well being; hence the well being of the community/society. Emile Durkheim, the “father” of sociology, argued that ‘Education is the influence exercised by adult generations on those that are not yet ready for social life.’ Durkheim was a firm believer in the idea of interdependence between institutions and social facts for the full functionality of any of its components. If any one component was not functioning in its totality then definitely the equilibrium that is aimed for would never be achieved. Functional sociologist also agreed that morals are the cornerstone by which a society is regarded, and if educational systems failed in passing these moral standards to their members, the results would be catastrophic.
What support is there for functionalist views of education?
Change; the main support, or proof, that the functionalist views of education are right on target. The society is ever changing and when the educational systems have failed to adjust to ‘change’ the results have been the imbalance in the configuration, a disparity in the relation between the major components that add to the equilibrium of society on a whole. The inability of these other organizations in promoting morals and norms are also reflected in the conflicts that arise between social facts and other institutions. Equilibrium as stated previously can only be attained if all integrants (both institutions and social facts) of the society contribute to each other by being efficient in its small tasks/functions.
You are so right! Society is ever changing and still the education system have yet to change. People tend to not be open for changes and remain comfortable with one system. If the system is failing then its time for a a change. The education system and the society go hand in hand to balance the equilibrium. Without making changes the equilibrium will always be imbalance.
DeleteI agree with you Mr. Jess society is ever changing and it will change even more as we going along in this life and it only right if the education system change alone with society to keep that balance. As to what the functionalist demonstrate that as same as the human body need the heart and the brain for it survival, society and education need each other to keep the balance.
DeleteHow do functional sociologist view the education system?
ReplyDeleteAccording to Durkheim, education is the influence exercised by adult generation on those that are not yet ready for social life. It's object is to develop in the child a certain number of physical, intellectual and moral states which are demanded of him by both the political society as a whole and the special milieu for which he is specifically destined. (Ballantine & Hammack, 2012, p.11).
School is a vital part of society as it is responsible for shaping norms and values in the preparation to facing society as an adult. The role of schools is to teach the child socialization, proper ways of conducting himself in society, his role is society as well as what he needs to do contribue to the stability of society.
Functionalist veiw of education as being a part of a whole which needs to do its part in the stability of society is evident to a major degree. School children are the pruduct of society,the nurturing of a child is reinforced at school but if the family, which is another part of society's functioning does no do it's part there may be issues is molding constructive members of society. It may be that many gang members were once enrolled in active education system but end up being the result of a broken down home, that is why they joined the gang. Non the less with the home doing its part it is more likely the functional sociologist are on the right tract.
According to Talcott Parsons (1937), the primary function of schools is the passing on of the knowledge and behaviors necessary to maintain order in society. Because children learn to be social beings and develop appropriate social values through contact with others, schools are an important training ground.
How do functional sociologists view the education system?
ReplyDeleteThe functionalist approach, espoused by Emile Durkheim, looks at society as a system of relatively stable interrelated parts.
Education is a social institution that has been tasked with transmitting knowledge and skills as well as teaching cultural norms and values which help to unite diverse societies.
The functional approach focuses on the ways in which schooling contributes to the orderly operation of society though these manifest (recognized and intended consequences) and latent (unintended and unrecognized) functions
• Socialization – teaching the shared skills, norms and values that young people need to succeed in life ( manifest)
• Cultural innovation-having capable instructors that are able to providing the opportunity for academic research that leads to important discoveries (manifest)
• Social integration- teaching cultural norms and values are vital in ensuring that the diverse population can be molded in one (manifest)
• Social placement- providing an opportunity to climb the social ladder by exerting the effort required to do and by reinforcing meritocracy (manifest)
• Latent functions- providing child care and the opportunity for building social networks
Therefore, socialization of the young by teaching shared norms and values is an important function of the schools as well as encouraging discovery and invention to improve our lives. Schooling helps to unite a diverse society by teaching shared norms and values.
What support is there for functionalist view of education?
ReplyDeleteThe functionalist view does have some place in the educational system, since as an institution, the school is part of an interdependent system in which each part contributes to the whole, so there is a need for unity and cohesion.
However support for this view has waned somewhat since it ignores the fact that not all the groups in society have the same views or even share the same goals. These conflicting views will have an effect on the institution’s ability to fulfill its function. In this climate where success is hinged on who you know rather than what you know, schools no longer play as instrumental a role in social placement as it might have once done. In reality, there is far too much emphasis on the function which focuses on ensuring that individuals can integrate into society by teaching them the shared values required for them to do so at the expense of other factors that prohibit the institution from maintaining the state of equilibrium- and conflict, inequality and social change. Hence, the support for the functionalist view is minimal at best.
How do the functionalist view the educational system?
ReplyDeleteThe functionalist believed that the educational system is greatly important for the survival of a society. Functionalist such as Durkheim (1858-1917) sees a relationship between society and the institution. Durkheim believed that what happens inside the classroom and the role of schools in preparing students will greatly affect the society, so education and society are interdependent of each other. He stated that the educational system cannot be separate from the society, they reflect each other. Other functionalist view the educational system as’ agents of socialization’. A bridge between family and society.
What support is there for the functionalist views of education?
There is support for the functionalist view of education. Functionalist see education as an integral part of the society. Education takes the different forms at different times and places, so it’s hard to separate education from the society. They are interconnected. Education is closely related to current values and beliefs of society. Moral values are the foundation of social order according to Durkheim. So the views of functionalist that schools are ‘social agents’ of the society gives validity to their belief that the educational system is of vital importance for the existence and survival of any society.
How do the functionalist view the educational system?
DeleteThe functionalist beliefs in summary are what I also believe to be the primary focus of our education system, “teaching for life”. Unfortunately the entire education has become merely a “cash cow” business where grades are the most important factor to derive at a student success. It is pathetic when students slip through the cracks of our education simply because they didn't meet a grading criteria of some traditional test system which in itself need to analyzed. Thus I have no other choice but to agree with Carol.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete1. How do functional sociologists view the education system?
ReplyDeleteThe functionalist theory concentrates on the ways universal education serves the needs of society. In order for the education system to work properly there must be a relationship between community and societal institutions. The Functionalists first see education as preserving and passing on basic information, knowledge and skills to the next generation. Education allocates people to the most appropriate jobs for their talents. Functionalists point to other latent roles of education such as transmission of core values and having social control in our society.
According to Durkheim the founder of functionalist theory, identified the latent role of education as one of socializing people into society's mainstream. This helped form a more‐cohesive social structure by bringing together people with diverse belief, values, and culture backgrounds.
2. What support is there for functionalist views of education?
Education helps to support society by the socialization of young people to cultural values. Education categorizes people to the posts to which they are best suited according to their talents through the use of examinations and qualifications. Not all of us are born with the same capabilities. In a community it is important that everyone has the opportunity to succeed in society on the basis of their ability. Schools operate according to meritocratic principles, and status is gained on the basis of merit. According to Functionalists, education has three major roles; the first of these is to reinforce the sense of belonging taking ownership of your community and schools. This is done is schools in a number of ways, sport activities, cultural day activities and competitions against other schools. The next role of education is to maintain social roles and social rules. Schools are like a wider society in miniature, so pupils learn that some people have more power than others, manners are important. They learn the patterns of behavior that will help them to survive in society when they leave school. According to Durkheim, the final function of education is to sort people out to do the correct work for their ability (meritocracy). In modern societies, we have division of labor. None of us has all of the skills that are needed to survive in this world.
According to Durkheim schools pass on the general values of society to students and also provide the skills that they will need to work together to build their community and produce goods. People must specialize in the kind of work that they feel confident doing. As a growing society we could not survive if we did not have community worker who specialize in doing different kinds of trade. People sit examinations, they are sorted out and then encouraged to take up jobs that is suited to what they are able to do. The most able will study the subjects that will encourage their thinking skills, and the low ability children are taught what they need for life.
Ms. Wright I totally agree with your views on the functionalist view on education. According to Functionalists, education has three major roles to reinforce the sense of belonging taking ownership of your community and schools,to maintain social roles and social rules and sort people out to do the correct work for their ability. Schools have an important role to play in developing any society. They do an important service for any community. Any nation that invest in its populace will flourish and succeed. We as a society needs to see the importance and value of education. Of course Belize might not be the best example of investing a lot of money in education and not getting value for its money. But the functionalist really made a point, education and society are so interconnected its hard to separate the two.
DeleteHow do the functionalist sociologists view the educational system?
ReplyDeleteFunctionalist sociologist states that educational system is necessary for survival of a society. The society’s system plays a role in the total working society. Society is more than just some of its parts. It is dependent on the structures that create it. Every structure has a function that meets a need of society and all the structure works together to maintain a social equilibrium. As the saying goes “it takes a community to raise a child.” The process of industrialization greatly influenced the development of the education system. As the educational system become universal more and more people are exposed to abstract learning rather than to the practical tradition of specific skills. Job opportunities today and careers have become dependent on degrees and school qualifications. Functionalist theory pin points that education cannot be separated from society because education plays a very important role for change to take place.
What support is there for functionalist views of education?
Functionalist theory has education as the balance of social equilibrium. Although each part is dependent on each other education plays a significant role within the entire structure. Education prepares us for which ever part we choose in society; so the two are dependent on each other to balance the equilibrium. However, changes are always taking place in society and studies have shown that the education system has not adjusted to the changes which cause the imbalance in society.
Camisha you are so right about the education system being so slow to react to the changes in the society. Sometimes its because of finance other times it because people are afraid of changes. They fight it tooth and nail because they are afraid of the unknown or because they are comfortable with the status quo.
DeleteCamisha, you are right! Society is much bigger than one individual entity.The different parts of a society play a major role in its betterment and no one part in independent. The "industrialization" phase did take a tole on how society deemed education; the rich used it to educate themselves just enough to keep their position and the poor were indoctrinated. In the end, some were but the others used it as a chance to better themselves. So yes, education is an important tool for change as well.
DeleteA functionalist’s standpoint on education is to have an agreement outlook to examine society in terms of how it is maintained for the common good. A functionalist will put an emphasis on positive aspects of schools such as socialization and the learning of skills and attitudes in school. Education helps maintain society by socializing young people into values of achievement, competition and equality of opportunity. Skills condition is also important: education teaches the skills for the financial system: For example, literacy, numeracy and IT for particular occupations. Role allocation is all part of this: education allocates people to the most suitable jobs for their talents, using examinations and credentials.
ReplyDeleteDurkheim views education as an unit made for social solidarity: community, cooperation. Education transmits culture: shared beliefs and values. Schools are a miniature society: cooperation, interaction, rules – universalistic standards. Specialist skills: division of labour – schools teach specialist knowledge and skills now Parson views education as being part of a meritocracy. Parson believes that education is a secondary agent of socialization, it bridge between family and society. Parsons believes that education instills values of competition, equality and individualism. In a meritocracy everyone is given equality of opportunity. Achievements and rewards are based on effort and ability – achieved status. Parsons is supported in these views by Duncan and Blau who believe that a modern financial system depends for its wealth on using human capital – its workers and skills. A meritocratic education system does this best.
"Functionalism and Education". HistoryLearningSite.co.uk. (2014). Web
After reading the chapter on Functionalist Approach and listening to the video documentary on Functionalism of Education, I gathered that Durkheim's view each part of the society as a whole. According to the Functional Theory Today it also mentioned that schools are one part of an interdependent system in which each part contributes to the whole. The analogy that was presented was the "Cell". Parts of a cell has its own function similary like society to maintain its social equillibrium and balance. Those parts includes: Laws Businesses, Churches, Government, Health care and of course the family. Therefore, schools main function is to educate and transform its to be productive citizens. What I found to be amazing was the "FEMINIST THEORIES". The feminist theorists argued for more attention to the condition of women. It went on to spoke about the injustices and differential treatment faced by many girls and women in schools around the world. If I may write in the " Belizean " context, while education was avaliable to both male and female, traditionally education was seen as a "Female" thing. Therefore, the men were cheated out of acquiring formal education, and were thus expected to be the labours, while females were encouraged to get their academic education. The other interesting side to that though, is the fact that even though men were less educated they still became prominent leaders in society. If you look closely at the male enrollment throughout all levels of our educational system, enrollment for mes is less than do females. Going contrary to the article which stated that " Boys around the world have a much better chance of completing levels of education from grade school on". I will also rebutt to what was mentioned that " girls barely see classrooms due to lack of access and opportunity". I may sound sexes but am being honest here people.
ReplyDeleteAccording to Durkhiem he sees school as a vital part of organic anology. Schools transmits the norm and values of society,keeping the value consensus. So what is a school without our children or children without the school? He also says that schools are dependent on the structures that Create it and that structure is our children. Every structure has a function that meets the needs of society. In other words it's just like the the body he says,if a organ fails then the entire body fails. However, according to parson 1956( the bridge guy) agreed with durkheim and says that school is a vehicle for transmitting norms and values keeping the value consensus.
ReplyDelete